Another important factor in how firewall policies work is the concept of precedence of order or if you prefer a more recognizable term, “first come, first served”.

It is highly likely that even after only a relatively small number of policies have been created that there will be some that overlap or are subsets of the parameters that the policies use to determine which policy should be matched against the incoming traffic. When this happens there has to be a method to determine which policy should be applied to the packet. The method which is used by most firewalls it based on the order of the sequence of the policies.

If all of the policies were placed in a sequential list the process to match up the packet would start at the top of the list and work its way down. It would compare information about the packet, specifically these points of information:

As soon as the a policy is reached that matched all six (6) of these parameters, the instructions of that policy are applied and the search for any other matching policies is stopped. All subsequent policies are disregarded. Only 1 policy is applied to the packet.

If there is no matching policy among the policies that have been configured for traffic the packet finally drops down to what is always the last policy. It is an implicit policy. One of a few that are referred to by the term “policy0”. This policy denies everything.

The implicit policy is made up of the following settings:

The only setting that is editable in the implicit policy is the logging of violation traffic.

A logical best practice that comes from the knowledge of how this process works is to make sure that the more specific or specialized a policy is, the closer to the beginning of the sequence it should be. The more general a policy is the higher the likelihood that it could include in its range of parameters a more specifically targeted policy. The more specific a policy is, the higher the probability that there is a requirement for treating that traffic in a specific way.

For security reasons there is no FTP traffic allowed out of a specific subnet so there is a policy that states that any traffic coming from that subnet is denied if the service is FTP, so the following policy was created:

Policy #1

Now as these things usually go it turns out that there has to be an exception to the rule. There is one very secure computer on the subnet that is allowed to use FTP and once the content has been checked it can them be distributed to the other computer on the subnet. So a second firewall policy is created.

Policy #2

By default, a policy that has just been created will be placed last in the sequence so that it is less likely to interfere with existing policies before it can be moved to its intended position. If you look at Policy #2 you will notice that it is essentially the same as Policy #1 exempt for the Source Address and the Action. You will also notice that the Source Address of the Policy #2 is a subset of the Source address in policy #1. This means that if nothing further is done, Policy #2 will never see any traffic because the traffic will always be matched by Policy #1 and processed before it has a chance to reach the second policy in the sequence. For both policies to work as intended Policy #2 needs to be moved to before Policy #1 in the sequence.